What have thirty years of democratic innovation yielded? What is the state of democracy? And once that state has been drawn up, isn’t it time to look at what kind of government our society needs?

In a democracy, everything revolves around the possibility for citizens to judge the policy or the actions, or the behavior of politicians. The representative of the people is the only one who has his boss below him: the voter. The voter and the elected are almost 100% dependent on the media for information about what is happening. If you look at the media production over a period of fifty years, you immediately see the changes in the selection of the subjects, the approach, and the shift in the valuation of news value. Entertainment value has become an increasingly important criterion. It can lie in the shocking or amusing or in the dramatic. News mainly lies in what is not working. What does work has no news value? Even if it is a wonder that something is going. This alone creates a skewed image.

Everything is translated in terms of winning and losing, slips, banana peels, moral indignation. Anything but personal drama. This is not only due to journalists, it is equally due to politicians. If you are one hundred percent dependent on the media to reach your voters, then you also have to meet the conditions to be communicated. That does not mean that journalists or politicians lie more than before. Not much lies in politics. That will be punished. That is why so much is played. It does mean that politicians tailor their message to the communication value. Not the facts, but their charge and the order can be edited. The story is true and it is not true. Adjectives do violate the truth but do not destroy it. So many adjectives. You are never disappointed, but very disappointed, never angry but furious, a difference of opinion is a quarrel.

In addition, no issue discussed in the public sector remains true to its size. Precisely because it has to be suitable for mass communication, and only to make it visible – and interesting – everything is magnified. This reduces the manageability of the problem and makes it more difficult to find an agreement for a solution This is a sharpened picture and there are, of course, many exceptions. But the core is this: where the organs of democracy – government, parliament, head of state, and the electorate – have defined their mandate, their rights and obligations constitutionally or constitutional and without which a democracy cannot exist: that is the free communication function of the media. That is also not possible, but that is the problem. The media has no responsibility for the functioning of the constitution, although they play a key role in it. Their motives lie in commerce and competition.

I have the feeling that the connotation of politics by the citizens is becoming increasingly negative because of the political culture within the triangle of government, parliament, and media. Moreover, that culture puts a lot of pressure on the administration itself. Ministers lack time to thoroughly think through and outline the main points of policy. Since the freedom of the press is inviolable within the limits of the law, the improvement of that culture will have to come from a change in the relationship between government and parliament.

A new fact is the stormy development of computer science, which will drastically change the relationship between citizens, but especially that between citizens and their community. Citizens’ greater self-reliance makes them much less dependent on the community or government in many areas. Is it not time that, in the light of these new facts and social developments, we took a look at what kind of governance our society needs, and what innovations must be introduced to prevent the word democracy from becoming an empty shell.

Read More

Half of the farmers are too poor, and some are too fat, so it is high time for a Ministry of Food’. This was mentioned by Tjeerd de Groot (D66) during the New Year’s debate. With nearly all candidate lists and election programs already accessible, it’s time to assess how political parties view an integrated food policy.

 

In most election programs there is now growing attention for the need for a food policy, but the interpretation usually remains too abstract. During the debate, five of the seven parties indicated that they were in favor of a new Ministry of Food, followed by a large majority of the public. A majority of the parties believe that politicians should opt for the ambition to make the agri-food sector climate neutral and circular within 10 years. The government will then have to invest billions to make this possible, just as with the energy transition.

 

The enormous interest  demonstrates that this topic is alive in society. Representatives from ministries, business, and politics were all over some of the media. Almost every political manifesto mentions food, showing the public’s rising interest in politics.

Healthy food

You should reset your gut health because healthy food has proven to be a controversial issue. The politicians agreed that the first step should be for people to understand what is healthy food and what is not. They differ on how the government should play a role in this. It advocated compulsory food education, labeling or a so-called traffic light system. People were unanimous about the fact that something must be done in the area of ​​awareness and simplification of choices. It was striking that almost all parties agreed with the statement that only healthy products should be offered in public spaces. It was felt that the government should finally set a good example, especially in school buildings where vulnerable children have to make choices about their health. This also applies to the kitchen of the House of Representatives.

 

Sustainable food

Stunts involving meat prices are controversial with most political groups. Any politicians believe that food can never be sold for less than the real price. Half of the farmers are poor, and many will stop farming in the coming years, which is intolerable to most political parties. They believe that if the agri-food industry begins to produce climate-neutral and circular products, great opportunities will occur. Some believe it will be possible in 10 years, while others believe it will take 20 years.

Everyone agrees that such a blip on the horizon is needed, and that doing so would make the company one of the most competitive in the world. Ten years seems ambitious, and it is, but Martin Scholten of Wageningen UR believes it is both realistic and necessary. According to politicians, the government must spend billions to help with the transition. As if the situation for the current transition to sustainable energy.

 

Ministry of Food

A majority of the politicians supported a Ministry of Food in the next cabinet. Five of the seven politicians agreed wholeheartedly, followed by at least three-quarters of the audience. The discussion focused mainly on the question of whether this ministry should be combined with the environment and / or climate. According to the politicians, food will be one of the most important major themes of the near future and this therefore requires the attention of a responsible policy person in the form of a Minister of Food.

Read More

Economics is concerned with analyzing and affecting the market. Politics is the concept and practice of affecting people throughout the practice of electricity, e.g. authorities, elections, and political parties. In concept, economics can be non-political, but in reality, it’s not so. A perfect economist must dismiss any political bias or bias to offer impartial, unbiased advice and recommendations about the best way best to enhance the financial performance of a nation. Elected politicians may then weigh this up financial info and choose. However, in fact, the finance and economy are constantly affected by the political situation of a nation and there’s a good effect of political choices and forces on the market.

Many financial problems are seen through the eyes of political customs. By way of instance, some folks are intuitively more leery of government intervention. Thus, they favor economic policies which want to decrease government interference in the market. On the flip side, economists could have a taste for encouraging greater equality in society and also be more prepared to encourage government intervention to pursue this end. In the event of India too, an individual could witness many instances wherein you could find how profoundly the politicians influence the market and how economists believe through their policies for state growth or to get vote bank. By way of instance, in the period of independence of India, the planning commission has been formed that resisted the 5-year program, determining the way the market will operate. Although that commission was preserved by economists or policymakers, the last power stayed with the PM who had been the chairperson of the commission. Until 1992, the idea of a globalized economy wasn’t implemented. Another such instance for politics affecting the market and financial policies could be “Demonetization”, which lacked the entire financial system of India from out. The consequence of GST was likewise a fantastic case of financial reforms according to political will.

Who conducts the market — economists or telemarketers? Another intriguing case is that the association between monetary policy (defined by the authorities) and fiscal policy (mostly set by separate Central Banks). Lately, in pandemic instances, we all are seeing how these decisions are taken at which at one stage RBI is functioning over the distribution side by changing interest rates whereas the government is functioning over the requirement by devoting crisis economic bundles.

 

Read More

Have you ever wished that our lives would be like this, or that we should be like that? “Politics” is the function of maintaining social order and maintaining a safe life while fulfilling our wishes and hopes. Currently, national and local politics is centered around voters’ elected members. A member of the Diet is a representative who reflects our opinion, and it is the “election” that decides the representative.

Politics based on the will of our people is called “democratic politics”, and in order to realize it, we need a mechanism to participate in politics. The most important way to participate in politics is “election”. Elections are the basis of democracy, and by participating in elections, our opinions are reflected in politics for the first time.

Democracy

There used to be times and nations where powerful people such as the king had great power and had a tyrannical politics that ignored the will of the people. However, in time, thinkers and the people insisted that “some powers should not trample on the rights that people have by nature!” And gradually expanded their powers to win the rights of the people.

The power to ultimately determine the politics of our country lies in our own hands, not in some rulers or a few privileged classes. Our people decide what our country should be. This is democracy, or democracy.

Car stuck in mud, snow, or breakdown?
Then this service is the one for you –
http://sanjosetowing.org/

“By the people” is the origin of democracy!

This famous word quoted when describing democracy is that of Lincoln, the 16th president of the United States. Of these, if it is limited to “politics for the people”, a tyranny would be possible. But the point “by the people” is only for democracy. Protecting this is the most important thing for democracy. Our politics for us, by ourselves. All elections must be done correctly in order to continue to protect it.

Right to vote and eligibility for election

The right to participate in politics is called “suffrage.” The core of suffrage is the right to elect everyone’s representatives in elections, and the right to participate in elections and become representatives of everyone. In order to have the right to vote or eligibility for eligibility, there are some conditions that must be met and some that must not be met.

Right to vote

In order to have the right to vote, there are conditions that must be met (positive requirements) and conditions that, if even one is true, the right to lose the right to vote (negative conditions).

When you get to the polling place first

On the day of the election, there are some things that the first person to vote in the morning must do. It confirms that there is nothing in the ballot box. It would be strange if the ballot was already included in the first vote in the morning. That’s why you ask the person who votes first in the morning to confirm it, and then the vote starts.

Read More

New Politics Report

  • Glass Buffing Safety Tips for General People for Secure Polishing
    Welcome to our guide on glass buffing safety. Whether you are a beginner or experienced in glass polishing, it’s crucial to prioritize your safety for a successful and secure polishing process. By following these glass buffing safety tips, you can effectively enhance the aesthetics of glass surfaces while minimizing potential risks. Let’s dive in and discover the key […]
  • Privacy Concerns in IPTV: Balancing Innovation with Data Protection Laws
    The rise of Internet protocol television (IPTV) brings forth a number of privacy concerns. As IPTV providers collect, store, and utilize user data, balancing innovation with compliance with data protection laws becomes imperative. Let’s explore the intricacies of this intersection and the importance of safeguarding consumer privacy in the realm of IPTV. Understanding Data Collection […]
𐌢