Digitization in Politics: iPhone Jailbreak
Digitization is changing how you communicate, work, shop and in short how you live. Newspapers and speeches from politicians have long been peppered with terms such as “Industry 4.0”, “Big Data” or “Digital Agenda”. Digitalization seems to have reached the public consciousness as an unstoppable megatrend. But a lot of it revolves around the question of how digital change is changing the economy.
On the other hand, you discuss far too little how digitization is changing society. If network access is an indispensable part of public services and machines decide the human fate, it is about more than new business models. It’s about the common good in the digital age. These days, iPhone, iPad and iPod jailbreak is becoming popular in the political sector.
So far, the digital political discourses have been dominated by particular interests. Regardless of whether it is the allocation of radio frequencies or the data protection debate. As a rule, the economy dominates the discourse by bundling its interests and thus making them heard.
iPhone, iPad and iPod jailbreak: So what is the impact of digitization on politics?
Digitization opens up new opportunities for participation and offers many citizens the opportunity to network in ways that were not possible in the past. The regulars’ table in the village pub and the daily newspaper lose their unique selling point as a political playground. Suddenly everyone can make their voice heard on Twitter and share their opinion on Facebook.
With one click you can signal your approval for an action, with the entry of your email address in a petition everyone can quickly satisfy their political conscience. In order to become active, you no longer need a party or an association. In contrast to party work, you don’t have to deal with a whole range of topics but can focus on a single topic.
Political views on iPhone, iPad and iPod jailbreak
No wonder, when it comes to politics, a parallel individualization of society has also been observed in recent years. It seems as if the individual no longer wants to admit to a political stance that extends over various topics and questions of life, but rather he or she wants to position himself or herself autonomously depending on the topic. A political worldview no longer has to be coherent today. Rather, depending on the topic, people like to serve themselves à la carte. Apart from the fact that many people shy away from political engagement because in the existing party structures it can take longer to hold a certain function that then promises the corresponding influence.
